Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 02:32
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
China consumer prices slump again, deepening deflation worries as demand stays weak - CNBC
What’s next?
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
How does gut health affect mental well-being?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Teen TikTok skin care craze may be harmful — and expensive, study finds - CNN
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Why is it that women are stronger than men nowadays?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
A neural brain implant provides near instantaneous speech - Ars Technica
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What's the most trivial thing that ever made you go to the doctor?